Match an inner derivative
Evaluate $\int 3x^2(1+x^3)^5\,dx$.
Set $u=1+x^3$, so $du=3x^2\,dx$.
Differentiation checks the result.
Recognize when substitution or integration by parts simplifies an integral, then carry the method through accurately.
Before calculating, decide what would make the integrand simpler. Is there an inside function together with its derivative? Try substitution. Is there a product with a factor that becomes simpler when differentiated? Try integration by parts.
Compare $2x\cos(x^2)$, where $2x$ is the derivative of the inside $x^2$, with $x e^x$, where differentiating $x$ removes that factor. These clues suggest a first move; they are not rules that make other valid methods impossible.
Look for a composite function and the derivative of its inner expression.
Look for a product where differentiating one factor simplifies it.
Checkpoint
Correct. $du=2x\,dx$ appears exactly, leaving $\int\cos u\,du$.
Not quite. Choose the method that removes the composite structure immediately.
$du=2x\,dx$ appears exactly, leaving $\int\cos u\,du$.
Example 1
Match an inner derivative
Evaluate $\int 3x^2(1+x^3)^5\,dx$.
Set $u=1+x^3$, so $du=3x^2\,dx$.
Differentiation checks the result.
A substitution changes the coordinate used to describe the same endpoints. For $u=x^2$, the endpoints $x=1,3$ become $u=1,9$: the interval labels must follow the new variable.
With a definite integral, either change the bounds into $u$-values or return completely to $x$ before evaluating. Do not mix the two.
Checkpoint
Correct. Substitute each original $x$-bound into $u=x^2+1$.
Not quite. Bounds must be transformed by the same substitution as the integrand.
Substitute each original $x$-bound into $u=x^2+1$.
Example 2
Differentiate the algebraic factor
Evaluate $\int xe^x\,dx$.
Choose $u=x$ and $dv=e^x\,dx$. Then $du=dx$ and $v=e^x$.
Differentiating $e^x(x-1)$ returns $xe^x$.
Order the method
Order a clean integration-by-parts method.
The method now preserves the roles of $u$, $du$, $v$ and $dv$.
A substitution may reveal a product that then needs integration by parts. Make one structural simplification at a time.
Example 3
A logarithmic substitution
Evaluate $\int x\ln(x^2)\,dx$ for $x>0$.
Let $u=x^2$, so $du=2x\,dx$:
Now integrate by parts: $\int\ln u\,du=u\ln u-u$.
The condition $x>0$ keeps the logarithm defined.
Checkpoint
Correct. Differentiating $\ln x$ simplifies it to $1/x$, while $x$ integrates easily.
Not quite. There is no inner derivative pattern that removes the product by a simple substitution.
Differentiating $\ln x$ simplifies it to $1/x$, while $x$ integrates easily.
Your score is not saved.
Let $u=3x$, or account directly for the inner derivative.
Let $u=3x$, or account directly for the inner derivative.
The remaining integral should be simpler than the original.
The remaining integral should be simpler than the original.
A complete substitution uses one variable throughout.
A complete substitution uses one variable throughout.
All antiderivatives differ by a constant.
All antiderivatives differ by a constant.
The numerator is a constant multiple of the denominator’s derivative.
The numerator is a constant multiple of the denominator’s derivative.
Want to leave a comment?
Log in